![]() |
![]() ![]()
Be advised that I have changed ISP and this commercemarketplace.com/home/CollectAir address has been changed to simply collectair.com which you can access by: This site will not be updated and is available only to redirect visitors to the new ISP; the new site has been updated and refined for improved readability and uniformity. Thank you for visiting CollectAir. Contact email is collectair@verizon.net.
A diminutive but comprehensive Friend or Foe? Museum of Aircraft Recognition is located in Santa Barbara, California as an adjunct to the CollectAir aviation art gallery. The museum is dedicated to the exhibit of teaching materials used by the armed forces during World War II to train gunners and aircrew in the identification of aircraft, ships and ground vehicles. The ability of servicemen to identify "friend or foe" in an instant was crucial to combat survival and the subject of recognition was taught in just about every World War II service school.
![]() The charge of the Friend or Foe? museum is typical for museums of all types: To provide safe custody for the artifacts, and to provide preservation, recording and display of items of interest from the past for the benefit of scholars and others interested enough to visit. Experience has demonstrated that there are very few persons interested enough in the subject (aircraft recognition) to visit specifically to see the collection and I have yet to host more than one or two scholars of the subject. This website page is therefore a way to reach those persons worldwide that have some degree of interest in the subject, if not from the collector's angle, then certainly from the aspect of historical interest. I plead guilty, as a curator, to the concept that this museum is a private indulgence, However, the collection is for sale to any major venue that is willing to exhibit to a wide and appreciative audience.
For those of you who seek more information about the aircraft recognition program or desire to communicate with other enthusiasts and possibly contribute pictures and data concerning your own collection or experiences, you are invited to join the new Yahoo interest group formed by Bill Larkins, an acknowledged aviation photographer, historian, author, AAHS founder, and a participant in the WWII training aids program. Just go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AircraftRecognition and join up.
![]()
![]() ![]() The photos above were taken by professional photographer Kanoa Zimmerman; Kanoa also provided the black and white at the top of this page. High resolution versions may be seen at the imagestation.com site mentioned elsewhere. The flight gear is mostly U.S. Navy issue.
![]()
![]() A wide variety of training artifacts is presented in a multi-exhibit area which the visitor experiences upon entry to the museum. The various materials used to manufacture government contracted models during WWII are represented in a wall display of 1:72 scale aircraft. An adjacent exhibit presents the civilian side of aircraft recognition with displays honoring the volunteers of both the WWII Aircraft Warning Service and the 1950's "Cold War" Ground Observer Corps, each group consisting of hundreds of thousands of volunteer spotters and workers operating out of thousands of observation posts and filter centers.
![]() ![]()
GOC - All Important Link. In spite of all the electronic devices, the far-flung radar stations and high-flying radar aiarcraft, the ships and subs and "Texas Towers," the most important link in the entire radar defense of our country is the Ground Observer Corps. This consists of some 16,000 observer posts, manned by over 370,000 volunteer civilian observers. These spotter towers blanket our coastal areas and our northern border, but there are still not enough of them. One and a half million more volunteer observers are needed, and nearly ten thousand more observation posts, like those shown on these pages. All posts are vitally important links in our defense system, for radar cannot spot low-flying aircraft, which must be picked up, identified and reported by the GOC spotters before it is too late. ![]() A "Ski-mobile" observation post site on Mt. Cranmore near North Conway, New Hampshire. Note the quaint "one person at a time" ski lift.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
RECOGNITION TRAINING IN WORLD WAR I
The need for recognizing aircraft by means other than national insignia became necessary in WWI. The use of manuals, silhouettes, photos and descriptions to distinguish friend from foe originated during the Great War to end all wars. Some WWI manuals are in the museum's collection. It is evident that the genesis of the silhouette stems from the need for the fledling combat pilot over the front to know a Fokker D-VII from a Nieuport or the anti-aircraft gunner to determine whether to shoot or not. The first two pictures below show a U.S. Signal Corps manual O.B. 1102 from November, 1917. In the "General Instructions" on page 1, mention is made, "Even a moderately trained observer should be able to distinguish between a hostile and a friendly machine at a distance of not less than 5,000 yards. If an observer is not able to do this, machine gun detachments will continually be having to 'stand to' only to dismiss a minute later when it is realized that the 'plane is friendly: whilst for anti-aircraft artillery work it is essential that on a clear day 'planes should be identified at ranges of not less than 10,000 yards." The manual further states that "Aeroplanes can be divided into two main classes: those designed for reconnaissance, artillery observation and bombing work, and those designed aas chasers and scouts." ![]() ![]() Manuals were issued by governments for the military or were privately printed for use by both military and civilian personnel. The following French manuals shown below were sold to the public. The first manual, Silhouettes d'Avions is interesting in that all views of the airplanes are done in a constant scale of 1:200, the only manual that I've ever seen like that. Note that the 1:200 scale was used by Wiking for Luftwaffe training models in WWII.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The first photo below shows silhouettes from the British manual entitled, Silhouettes of Aeroplanes; this recognition guide is not marked as military and contains both silhouettes and photos. The national insignias are also from this manual. The third photo of the F.2.A. Flying Boat is from the British military manual D.A.I.6 (A.I.4.), F.S. Publication 60, dated August, 1918, and entitled Types of British Seaplanes - Flying Boats and Ship's Aeroplanes. A note on the manual's cover enjoins the user that the manual is "Not to be Carried in Aircraft".
![]() ![]() ![]()
![]() A group of Air Force photos from the Smithsonian collection show 1942-43 gunnery students at Laredo Army Air Field, Texas engaged in airplane recognition training as they use some of the early types of models constructed from wood, plaster and cardboard. The museum visitor is transported back to August, 1940 to become an RAF Spitfire pilot tracking a "bogie" airplane as the reticule of an authentic Mk II Reflector Gunsight lights up and a twin-engine warplane at 200 yards appears in the sights. Is this a friend or foe? Should I fire at a Messerschmitt Me 110 or dip my wings at a friendly Beaufort?
![]() Aerial target kite Mark 1, Device 3-C-29, developed by the late Paul Garber of the Smithsonian Institution and others. Paul kindly provided me with rigging instructions. This particular kite was originally donated to a V.F.W. post in Spring Valley, New York soon after WWII.
![]()
![]() ![]() Touring further, the WWII National School Model Building Program is highlighted with an exhibit of a group of the original schoolboy-built wood models, along with plans, books, memos and other ephemera associated with the program which began in early 1942 to provide hand-built, 1:72 scale wood recognition models to the armed forces until such time that mass production, plastic models became available for training purposes. Click here for a wartime Comet Model Airplane ad for their "Official Identification Kits." The late Dr. Paul Garber, former Historian Emeritus of the National Air and Space Museum, was instrumental in developing the program as his services as a civilian were loaned to the Navy Department in early December, 1941 and became part of the Navy's Special Devices Division of the Bureau of Aeronautics with a Navy commission in May, 1942. Dr. Garber also devised a controllable Target Kite which was used for gunnery practice; a fully rigged example of his Mk 1 kite, made by Spaulding, is on exhibit with a Mitsubishi "Zero" screened on the kite fabric. Paul Garber became aware that Admiral John H. Towers reported that the Navy required some sort of airborne moving gunnery target; Garber believed that a kite might solve the problem. He worked after hours along with two kite flying buddies, Lloyd Reichert and Stanley Potter, and also with Paul Gwillow, to come up with a rough target kite which had a keel and rudder and could be controlled by two lines. Work on a prototype target kite leading to production began in earnest in the Fall of 1942. Firing tests were conducted in January, 1943 and the first production units from a trial order with Comet Models reached the field for test by May, 1943.
![]()
![]()
![]() A very thorough history of the target kite program, Garber's involvement, and documentation and manuals (including a 53-page tech manual, U.S. Navy Target Kites Navaer 30-30RC-55) is located at http://www.rtpnet.org/robroy/targetkites/. This is a very informative website.
![]() Navy Commander Luis de Florez of the U.S. Navy Special Devices Division (L) with Dr. Paul Garber (R). In 1944, Captain Luis de Florez USNR, was awarded the Robert J. Collier Trophy for 1943 for his contribution to the rapid training of combat pilots and crews through the introduction and development of inexpensive synthetic devices.
"On the 23rd of February the high schools throughout the country received their first sets of model airplane plans. This was the beginning of a program that would enable the youth of America to become an essential part of the war effort, the building of exact scale, model planes. Jim Alaback, a modelling historian associated with the San Diego Air&Space Museum, wrote an interesting article on the school model building program in the September 1996 KAPA newsletter, "The KAPA Kollector". This issue may be obtained for $3.00 from KAPA, 1788 Niobi Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92804-2630. I received interesting comments from a wartime recognition model builder, Royce Childress, who constructed the wood models in Huntington Park, California. Royce states that, "I made several of these (recognition models) during WW2. I would go to the Post Office and they had a list of the models wanted. I'd pick one and they would give me the plans and suitable pine or fir wood blocks to build it. When finished, I'd take the model back to the Post Ofice and get another one." Does anyone else remember using the Post Office for this purpose?
American recognition training didn't begin in ernest until our entry into World War II. Well over a year later, the Life magazine-style publication, U.S. Army-Navy Journal of Recognition, was first published in September, 1943. It's mission was stated in a foreword, "No Margin for Error" in issue number 1; a portion of that statement is reprinted below. The magazine changed its name to Recognition Journal with issue 9 and ceased publication following the August, 1945 issue. "More training is needed. The accepted teaching methods of recognition place great emphasis on seeing an object as a whole and being able, through constant practice, to recognize that object (plane, tank, ship, etc.) from any angle. There are no short cuts to recognition. To promote recognition three methods are used: small, handy manuals covering almost every operational ship, plane and tank either have already been published by one of the services or are forthcoming. In addition courses utilizing such teaching methods as movies, slides, silhouettes and photographs are produced for men in training. Lastly, in the field, on warships and at front line airfields are specially trained recognition officers. Issue number 3 of the Journal is shown above. The Journal information also appeared as part of the "Recognition Instructor's Information Letter" - for interest, five silhouettes from a 1945 "Letter", all jets, can be viewed as a PDF file by Clicking Here.
![]() Wall display at left of the civilian Aircraft Warning Service Observer program during WWII and the Ground Observer Corps similar program during the cold war period of the early to mid-1950s. Background shows part of cabinet display of German Wiking WWII, 1:200 scale recognition models.
![]() Hundreds of Observation Posts ringed the U.S. manned with civilian volunteers from the Ground Observer Corps serving with the Aircraft Warning Service. Round-the-clock air-defense service as observers or in the Filter Centers or Information Centers, these volunteers spanned age groups, from Boy Scouts to grandmothers. In the early, uncertain days of World War II, the fear of enemy attack gained a foothold with the civilian population of coastal areas - indeed, there was an actual West Coast enemy nuisance shelling near Santa Barbara and many false alarms and on the entire East Coast, beachgoers witnessed countless sinking ships just off the coast in sea lanes, the victims of free roaming German U-boats in 1942. Rumors of attacks and the capture of German spies landing from subs fueled the alarm. Volunteer observers felt that they were doing "something" about the threat - neighbors of observers were then "safer" because there was someone watching the skies that they knew. Coastal cities were eventually blacked out but this took almost a year to institute. The museum has many documents, manuals, magazines and other GOC information from this interesting era.
![]() The threat of an enemy attack soon waned as the war progressed. At first the posts went on a reduced schedule, but by 1944, it was evident that they were not needed and that some of their essential services could be wrapped into Air Forces installations at training bases. Consequently, on May 16, 1944, the Secretary of War announced that the Aircraft Warning Centers would be closed and that the observers should transfer to some other voluntary war service. That letter, along with a letter to "All Volunteers of the Aircraft Warning Service" from Headquarters, First Fighter Command, Mitchel Field which commends the volunteers may be viewed by clicking here. Return to this page with the back-arrow.
![]() (The cartoon above is from "Male Call", a wartime strip for military publications drawn by "Terry and the Pirates" creator, Milton Caniff. This box is taken from the 2/21//43 "Zest in OTS".) Many of the production recognition models had elaborate configurations that required many detailed parts such as bi-planes, struts, floats, fixed gear, tailwheels etc. About a hundred of these are displayed in a single case to demonstrate the complexity and degree of production sophistication used for such a mundane war effort product as a training aid. Several models of aircraft that never existed are on exhibit, pointing out the inadequacy of some WWII intelligence. Miniature recognition models in 1:432 scale, used for hand held personal use, are also shown.
![]() ![]() 1943 ad in "Collier's" for Airplane Spotter Playing Cards which are regular decks used for card games. These civilian cards were also purchased and used by military personnel while playing cards, unlike the flash card decks also pictured above which were used for training purposes only.
![]() Ref. No. 953. IDENTIFICATION POSTER FOR A6M ZERO. July 1942. Original WWII poster made in the U.S. Wording at top reads: “Japanese Fighter Type Zero (“0”).” At bottom of poster it reads: “Identification Poster . . No. 3 7/42 D.I.T.-A.A.F.- Identification Unit. From Data currently available. Restricted. U.S. Government Printing Office; 1942-O-477937.” Poster image from http://www.warbirdsite.com of New Zealand, a website worth visisting.
Recognition training remained a critical issue through the 1950s. The Bureau of Naval Personnel, in NAVPERS 16138-C dated 1955, Naval Orientation, has a section devoted to recognition. A portion of that section may be viewed by clicking here. Use the back arrow to return.
Models used for photographic recognition purposes: The U.S. lacked photographs of many of the Japanese, German and Italian aircraft as we entered WWII. The Special Devices Division of the U.S. Navy handcrafted a series of realistic models which were then photograhed in a studio to simulate flight conditions. A rear screen projection gave a realistic looking sky as the models were held in place by a stinger - propellers were rotated by blowing on them. Training films, manuals and other study devices used these Navy-built models. Similar models of Axis planes for photographic purposes (recognition manuals and film) were constructed in England by V.J.G. Woodason of Woodason Aircraft Models in Heston; further information on these models is provided in the British section on this page. These superb Navy models eventually found their way to the Smithsonian and have been on display at NASM in Washington. Examples of the Nakajima B5N2 and the Mitsubishi G4M2 are shown below; these CollectAir photos are from 1990.
![]() ![]() The August 1945 edition of Popular Science has an excellent article covering the Navy's photographic model program entitled, "Navy Modelmakers Build Enemy Planes." This article indicates that the model shop was in Washington whereas the NASM exhibit states that most were made in Orlando. Capt. Luis de Florez, director of the Special Devices Division, appointed Naval Reserve Lieutenant Jim Barry to be in charge of the model program; Barry was an experienced modeler with many models on exhibit at fairs, expositions and at the Smithsonian. The photo below is from the article.
![]() The complete article, with photos, from Popular Science can be viewed in PDF form by clicking here.
World War II Government Teaching Aids on Exhibit - A Unique Show ![]() Cellulose acetate plastic recognition model in 1:72 scale of the B-25 dated July 1942 and manufactured by Cruver of Chicago (2456-60 Jackson Blvd, Curtis L. Cruver, pres/tres, and Curtis L. Cruver Jr., secretary). Most recognition models were made from injection-molded cellulose acetate plastic.
![]()
![]() ![]()
A Douglas B-23 in 1:72 scale molded in plaster of paris, reportedly by a manniken manufacturer. The model is marked "B-23". These plaster types are quite rare and, as can be expected, were not satisfactory as they would easily break.
![]()
A 1:72 scale Lysander reportedly made by the Leominster Plastics Co., 45 Spruce Street, Leominster, Mass. It is a nice model made by a blow-molding process (hollow); has a paste-on sticker which has "England Lysander I. 5/43". This company also made a C-47.
![]() A 1:72 scale solid metal model of the four-engine Heinkel He 177. This series was made early in WWII. The model is marked "HE.177. PROP U.S.A.C." The Navy's Bureau of Aeronautics handled the contracting for the plastic models but these metal models are obviously an Air Corps procurement, prpbably made by BronzeArt of New York. Heavy and breakable. The series includes a B-25 which is of the earliest version with a straight dihedral wing (in the museum collection) which gives an idea of the procurement date.
![]()
![]() A 1:72 scale cardboard A-20A. These models came in a die-cut flat sheet contained in an envelope. When assembled, the model was an effective three-dimensional training piece. This particular model is marked with an impression "A.A.F. A-20A Br. BOSTON III A.B. or HAVOC II N.F.". This is an Air Forces model Number CM-510 dated 2/22/43. The Navy also had a similar series. The original series of 1942-43 was maintained throughout WWII with no changes. If you ordered this large set in 1945 you received a Brewster Buffalo and many others of obsolete vintage! A number of these models are for sale on the Ephemera Page Link.
![]() ![]() ![]() Pictured above are two sets of 1:432 plastic "pocket" recognition models. These models were manufactured by Cruver (several appear in a Cruver ad shown in the Appendix). Most collectors assume that the military issue, wartime models (both metal and plastic) had a hole located at the c.g. - each of these models has a hole. The U.S. set is at the top with the British set below. Only a few models in each set actually have the Cruver identity mark, ©, but all have a date and airplane type marked on the underside of the wing or fuselage (the identity mark was only used on a single model of a "tree" as multiple models were molded at once. Comet Metal Products also made 1:432 models in white metal - these were usually painted olive drab and had a hanging or mounting hole (see below). Both of these types were sold to the public following WWII and in some cases were used as premiums for cereal etc. The "civilian" models came in different colors (grey plastic for example although the metal models were sold in olive drab as "Authenticast" models) and did not usually have the "hanging hole" although some are pictured in the Authenticast catalog mounted on a wire from a stand. Molds for the metal models have been used by various companies to make (cheaply molded with stiffened surfaces) pieces for wargamers, and more recently, a line of beautifully cast pewter models on stands (by DFC) which are no longer being made. These 1:432 models are arguably the longest used production airplane model molds ever used - 1943 to around 1993.
![]()
![]()
![]() This 1:72 scale model of the PBY Catalina is not in my museum's collection but is located in the recognition model program exhibit case at the Garber Facility of NASM; this case was put together by Bob Mikesh when he was Senior Aeronautical Curator at the museum restoration facility a number of years ago. It is an unusual model because it is made of fiberglass and a notation in the exhibit states that the (then) unrefined process, "produced models that did not hold their shapes well." The Defiant at right is also fiberglass. Certainly rare models.
![]() Cruver models were molded from various mixes of cellulose acetate. This particular P-80 had black paint over silver when I received it; many of the P-80 were painted silver and I'm not certain that this was limited to the Aristo-Craft line or not. After removing the paint, the basic plastic is not the usual shiny black but rather a somewhat striated buff color, a not unusual condition. It is shown here to demonstrate the variations to be found in the ID models.
![]() Not an American-made model, this Beaufort is a German Luftwaffe recognition model in 1:50 scale, made of wood and is marked with an impression of "BEAUFORT" under the wing and a small "gur" on the fuselage. A teacher's scale model used in the classroom, this model has not been restored but is in the original paint scheme used. Nicely made, the 1:50 scale were reportedly made in Czechoslovakia. The museum has a number of these including a very nice "Fortress II".
![]()
![]() ![]()
![]() An original German issue cardboard model template from WWII. This small "3-dimensional", 1:132 scale recognition model (printed on paper) is much less sophisticated than the American cardstock 1:72 scale models of the same period. This template was given to the museum by Georges Grod of France. I would like to find out more about these "models" - was there a cardstock copy accompanying this template? Many others in this 1:132 series included the Stirling, Wellington III, Fortress II, Lancaster, A-20B Boston III, Beaufighter I, Hurricane I, Spitfire V, Typhoon, Whirlwind, Ventura, Thunderbolt (has no silhouette views), Mitchell, Lightning, and Halifax I. The reverse side is blank.
![]() ![]() German tank recognition model in 1:20 scale. This German wood model most closely represents the Panzerkampfwagen IV (PzKpfw IV) medium tank, Ausf G (toward the end of the G's production run) which entered service in May 1942. The Panzer IV tank, in all of its variants, was the most widely used German tank of WWII, the mainstay of the Panzenwaffe. Developed in 1934, the Panzer IV was in production throughout WWII and was used on all german battle fronts. The G model increased armament to the long barrel 48 calibre 7.5 cm KwK 40 (L/48) and late models had the antenna located at the left rear. The inscription on the right side states, "This is an official object, misuse is punishable." An outstanding model with much more attention to detail than necessary for a recognition model. Other German 1:20 tank models have surfaced which have much less replication of detailed tank features.
The symbol or maker's mark shown at left appears on the Panzer IV model's bow plate. If you can identify the meaning of this mark, I would appreciate hearing from you. No other identifying marks appear on the model. It has been suggested by a German correspondent that the mark could be from a a southern German manufacturer of wood Christmas decorations such as the "nutcracker." A WWII German recognition training projector is pictured below. This unit is self contained for field use; the top lid with a carrying handle also serves as a container tray for the film strips and spare parts. A sample film strip portion for a "Liberator" is also pictured.
![]() ![]()
![]() A "Shipboard Eyeshooting and Recognition Trainer", U.S. Navy Device 3-D23, Serial No. 672, by the Special Devices Division Office of Research and Inventions. The two projectors are typical of those used throughout the military in WW2 for film strips and slides; they were made by Society for Visual Education, Inc. in Chicago, Illinois. No military marking or government identification was used on these widely employed items. This particular box includes film strip canisters in the lower drawer; one unit projected a gunner's reticle which the student then adjusted to the correct postion for firing on an incoming airplane projected by the second unit. The museum collection includes many ship recognition models in scales ranging from a minute 1:5000 to 1:500; most of these models were issued in cased sets grouped by country. Several examples are shown below. The first is a U.S. Navy Identification Model in 1:500 scale of the OAKLAND, an ATLANTA CLASS CL made by H.A. Framburg & Co. of Chicago and dated 12-44. The model has a wooden hull and the rest is cast metal. The chart is an Army Air Forces Chart No. 18, July 1943, of Guadalcanal Island and Solomon Islands.
![]() A 1:500 scale Identification Model of the MAHAN CLASS Destroyer, made by Comet Metal Products Co. A wood hull with cast metal structures.
![]() The majority of World War II ship recognition models were made in 1:1200 scale by several companies. Comet Metal Products made 1:1200 and 1:500 scale ship models and sold these models after the war to the civilian market under the brand name "Authenticast". The compnay was founded in 1919 by Abraham Slonim and specialized in die-casting; he brought his sons, Joseph and Samuel, into the company in 1935. Comet Metal Products was located in Richmond Hills, Queens, New York. "Authenticast" was the name of their patented centrifugal casting process. Comet made millions of models during World War II and continued making models in the postwar era; sold in 1962 to Jeff Bowen who hired John Carter to produce the models which eventually became the Superior line as a follow-on to Authenticast (now part of Alnavco). The model shown below was made by Comet; it is labeled as "SOUTH DAKOTA CLASS US BB" and has "COMET" inscribed on the bottom. The 1:1200 scale models came in boxed sets organized by country; the museum has many of these sets in the collection.
![]() Some ship models were constructed by the Navy for training purposes unrelated to recognition training. The photo below is from the August 1945 issue of Popular Science showing a 1/8" to 1 foot scale model of the Cleveland Class cruiser. Paul Garber is the gentleman observing the model.
![]()
Want to See More Pics? ![]() BRITISH RECOGNITION MODELS The Friend or Foe? Museum of Aircraft Recognition has a nice collection of British-made recognition models from both WWII and the postwar, 1950s era. Information on the manufacturers of these models is rather sparce, however, so the following is presented in an attempt to garner more information on the British ID model efforts as well as entertain. If you can provide any further insight, please contact CollectAir. Addionally, I'm certain that you will enjoy seeing some of the not-too-common recognition models made in England. The He 115 shown below is an example of a British 1:72 scale, Bakelite plastic ID, manufacturer unknown. An advertisement was carried in one of the postwar British magazines offering "60,000 R.A.F. Recognition Models" for sale" and this model is from that particular group. The ad stated that they were 1/72 scale and "beautifully detailed jobs" and that there were 50 different models. Pictured are six models with the entreat "Get them now - cannot repeat." The company running the ad, Astral Aero Model Co., Dixon Lane Road, Leeds 12., is probably not the manufacturer. ![]() The model has the aircraft type, He 115, in raised letters on the bottom of the fuselage - no other markings. It is solid with a heavy feel, has no details of canopy, control surfaces etc. and is very smoothly molded.
![]() The British have always been obsessed with "spotting", railway spotting coming immediately to mind. Aircraft spotting, as outlined in this article, occupied the civilian sector in the 1930s more than the military and the civilian, para-military Observer Corps was a "clubby" and patriotic endeavour. Actual recognition training wasn't initiated until war clouds appeared and each branch of the service attempted some sort of training, though not co-ordinated nor effective, and the civilian program was sort of incorporated under military guidance but couldn't use classified material. Commercial aviation magazines provided the largest impetus toward recognition methods, coming up with the best silhouette information and general specifications for European airplanes. The following brief overview of British recognition training programs is culled from various British magazines, books and manuals of the WWII period and from the very excellent book, Identification Friend or Foe, by Tim Hamilton. This book was published in 1994. In it, Tim Hamilton covers the complete spectrum of British recognition efforts, civilian and military, from the beginnings in WWI through the end of WWII plus a brief comment on postwar efforts. I doubt whether this book experienced many sales in the U.S. but copies may be found from British sources. Two other books have been published which are dedicated to the Royal Observer Corps; Derek Wood's Attack Warning Red (1979) and Forewarned is Forearmed by T.E. Winslow, published in 1948 (see below for further discussion concerning this book).
The British first experienced enemy aircraft overhead in December 1914 as the Isles were attacked by a German Taube monoplane. In January 1915, two German Navy Zeppelins dropped bombs on the Norfolk coast. Aircraft drawings and silhouettes began to circulate as the military recognized the need to familiarize forces with the aircraft seen flying overhead in greater numbers, particularly their own. RFC Observer aircraft were equipped with machine guns in the spring of 1915 and aerial warfare was born. The French produced the first recognition manual incorporating three-position silhouettes. In the early stages of WWI, pilots were to identify other airplanes they encountered by markings and paint schemes, an entirely unsatisfactory method of identification for many and obvious reasons. The British were shooting down French airplanes, proving that recognition training was necessary - at least the French thought so. By mid-1918, the British issued a series of recognition manuals as Air Council Field Service publications. These were the first British manuals devoted to recognizing aircraft. CollectAir has several of the British, French and American manuals from WWI in the museum collection. ![]() British instruction in ship identification for Royal Naval Air Service Balloon Officers, circa 1916 - Photo IWM Q33769A. During the inter-war period, aviation hit a high point in the public's eye with record setting flights and milestones during the 1920s but began a lull as the thirties approached. The Air League of the British Empire began an aggressive campaign to develop airmindedness with its Empire Air Day program following the example of the 1932 National Aviation Day Campaign. A Junior Air League section was formed by A.J. Holladay, called the "Skybird League" in 1933 and the decision was made to market commercial solid-scale model kits of current model airplanes in 1:72 scale. Many "Skybird" members who crafted models from these kits and drawings later became RAF pilots such as Neville Duke. This was a civilian commercial endeavour, nevertheless it was the progenitor of the government recognition model program for the British and for the U.S., both of which would come belatedly. The British Observer Corps became more active by the mid-1930s, patriotic volunteers working for home defense by spotting airplane movements, sort of an "early warning" system. Recognition training was not requisite for the volunteers and the only information furnished was an Air Ministry silhouette book, AP.1480, which was inadaquate at best. The pastime of airplane spotting became popular and civilian enthusiasts were keeping detailed journals and specification sheets on countless airplanes throughout Great Britain. The Air Ministry's AP.1480 silhouettes were the primary recognition training tool in 1937 even though the quality of the silhouettes was poor as was pointed out by critics working for major aviation magazines. A new recognition manual, AP.1764, with the same silhouettes, was issued to pilots and air gunners as Great Britain approached war with Germany. Several fatal military incidents occurred in 1939 as a result of mis-identification of RAF aircraft as enemy units, bring home the need for recognition training. The major British magazines, The Aeroplane and Flight started printing aircraft identification material in their publications and The Aeroplane published the first non-government identification book. The technical editor, Peter Masefield, known as PGM to his cohorts, promoted accurate aircraft recognition vigorously and became a patron of the newly formed "The Hearkers Club", a group devoted to recognition training within the Observer Corps. (NOTE: Sir Peter Masefield died on February 14, 2006, living to the age of 91.) Model airplanes entered the scene in 1940 as The Aeroplane kept expanding its recognition pages; as suitable photos were not always available, models from V.J.G. Woodason of Heston were photographed for the recognition charts. The Woodason models were being produced for the Air Ministry in the 1939-1943 period for use in filming and manuals. Some Woodason models were used in movies of the period. The July 16, 1942 The Aeroplane Spotter magazine has a picture of a Woodason Ju 88A6 at the factory in a rather large scale and is decorated with paint scheme and insignia. A history of the Woodason Aircraft Models company and Victor Woodason can be accessed at Woodason Aircraft Models History page on this website.
"Friendly fire" problems during the Battle of Britain were just one of many recognition snafus that eventually forced the RAF to form their own Aircraft Recognition Wing in late 1940. The RAF then established their own recognition school on the Isle of Man. Concurrently, a new civilian publication by Peter Masefield, The Aeroplane Spotter, mentioned above, came on the scene in January 1941. Air raids on Britain gave birth to "Raid Spotters" who alerted factory workers when enemy aircraft were approaching. The Raid Spotters formed into a new "Spotters Clubs" exclusive of the Observer Corps. Modelling clubs allied themselves with the spotters, and civilian-made solid models, in various scales, became part of the overall scheme. Controversy over how silhouettes should be drawn erupted when Penguin Books published a paperback, Aircraft Recognition, by R A Saville-Sneath using the AP.1480 silhouettes which had thick white lines showing minimal detail. PGM of The Aeroplane Spotter and The Aeroplane advocated thinner lines to outline greater detail within the silhouette and had been using this improved technique in his magazines and booklets. ![]() The Air Ministry, by the end of 1941, started using thinner detail lines in their AP.1480 silhouettes, thereby ending the controversial issue. Another civilian spotters book was published in January 1941, The Spotter's Handbook authored by a man destined to become famous, Sir Francis Chichester.
The Royal Observer Corps (ROC) started publishing its own magazineThe Journal of the Royal Observer Corps in the fall of 1941. Not being a government publication, this magazine could not use classified material. By 1942, the Air Ministry was faced with the growing problem of co-ordinating recognition training for the three services, particularly as U.S. forces began to arrive in Great Britain. An Inter-Service Recognition Committee report spurred the RAF to form a new Visual Aircraft Recognition Training Committee. The Inter-Service Recognition Committee launched a new official publication, Aircraft Recognition, in September 1942 under the MAP and headed by Peter Masefield. This new publication doomed the ROC's journal and it lasted only until December 1942.
The history of the ROC, beginning in 1914, is covered in the 1948 book, Forewarned is Forearmed by T.E. Winslow, as pictured at left. WWI, the in-between war period, the first year of WWII, the Battle of Britain, 1942-1943, reorganization, 1944-1945, and stories and details of the many ROC operational areas fill the book.
The author also states in the section on 1942 reorganization that "At the commencement of the war, as we have seen, the Posts had merely to report the postion of aircraft continously to their Centres, and to co-operate in that duty with other Posts on the same telephone circuit, while aircraft recognition, as understood in 1942, was not the official duty of the Observers at the Posts at the time of the outbreak of war." Later, however, proficiency in Aircraft Recognition became one of the list of Post duties. Anyone wishing to further study the ROC should read Forewarned is Forearmed. Sentinels of Britain - The Wartime Story of the Royal Observer Corps is a 155 minute DVD recently issued by Air Supply in Yeadon. Sixteen men and women who served during WW2 with the ROC tell their stories of duty as observers and spotters and each, in his own way, impart the great sense of duty, enthusiasm and dedication that these lonely sentinels felt. The individual tales are mixed with scenes of wartime England and the ROC activity. This is a fine effort to capture the way these individuals put the ROC in the forefront of their daily lives as they, along with their fellow post crew, manned observer posts or centres around the clock, reporting or plotting air movements with accuracy and diligence. The following photos are stills from the DVD and give just a hint of the stories that these wonderful people tell in their recollections of WW2 and the ROC.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
![]() Author and master modeler, V.J.G.Woodason, mentioned previously in connection with photographic models, wrote a thorough exposition of wood model airplane construction during the war, entitled The Art of Scale Model Aircraft Building. Anyone interested in solid scale models is directed to obtain this wonderful book published in 1943. Woodason devotes several chapters to models as recognition training aids; "Aircraft Recognition - The Use of Scale Models" and "Use of Models by Direct Observation" cover some of the British training methods in recognition at the time of his writing. Quote Mr. Woodason, "An accurate scale model aeroplane contains all the essential features necessary for the study if aircraft recognition. Being solid it may be examined in perspective and, being to scale, its appearance is identical to the appearance of the actual machine seen at a correspondingly greater distance. "Even today (1943) this latter point is not fully appreciated. More often than not models issued to service and other units are stored away like museum pieces or, at the most, are festooned from the ceiling of a room which is out of bounds to the rank and file." Woodason cites a R.O.C. Club Journal article describing a device for viewing a model at a distance and adjusting the orientation. A spotter's box, used on the H.M.S. Excellent, is specified as is the R.A.F.'s well known Hunt Trainer using mirrors and reflection methods; all of these devices used 1:72 scale models. He also suggests, in the chapter entitled, "Why Build Scale Model Aircraft," that the maker of model airplanes can donate them to the local Observer Corps, Air Training Corps and Anti-Aircraft posts for training in recognition. Woodason's motto is "Watch And Make", WAM, or Woodason Aircraft Models. An ad for his activity at the Heston Airport in Middlesex reads, in part, "When Aircraft Manufacturers, Air Line Operators, Exhibition Committees and the Museums require aeroplane models of high quality they consult Woodason Aircraft Models, the firm whose specialised experience and workmanship is unsurpassed - Remember the Name!" Woodason Aircraft Models History page gives additional information on the Woodason models.
![]() Available government furnished, official recognition models were listed in the first issue of Aircraft Recognition with the statement by editor, PGM, that "...silhouettes and models that have been issued in the past have been inaccurate, and replacements are now in hand and will shortly be available." Forty-seven models were listed in issue No. 1 followed up by an additional nineteen models in issue No. 5. Probably the largest collection of British recognition models in England has been amassed by collector George Cox (museum collections are sparse). In addition to his collection, George has listed all the models that he and several fellow collectors have run across, both wartime and postwar, and this list runs to something like 210 models. I will be happy to send you a copy of this list if you send CollectAir a SASE. George asks that if you can add to this list, please let us know. George has contributed his knowledge of the subject to this article. Ron Crawford, a 1:200 scale airplane guru, undoubtedly knows more about 1:200 models than anyone else in the world; Ron both manufacturers and collects 1:200 scale models and has researched and documented the history of Wiking Modellbau and other 1:200 manufacturers throughout the 20th century. Ron has added some information to the British aspect of 1:200 aircraft recognition models in use during WWII. 1:200 scale aircraft models were made for the Royal Navy and Merchant Navy, most likely by two different manufacturers. These models were designed for use by anti-aircraft personnel and aerial gunners. The Royal navy models were grey metal castings with very limited detail and were issued in small sets of about twenty models that varied in type based on the theater of operations. The Merchant Navy models were limited to the few types most likely to be encountered at sea. Ron says that he has encountered both types, some in raw casting and some airbrushed. Recently, a British WWII, 1:200 scale recognition and aiming trainer set was offered at auction. This boxed set was a "Portable Aiming Teacher Mk.II Pat. No. 10698". The box measured 21 inches by 15 inches and housed about sixteen metal 1:200 models, each on a rod extending from the tail section. Each model has a clear plastic disc representing a rotating propeller, similar to the Wiking models. A hand-held device fastened the model in such a way that is was viewed through a peep-hole and a cross-hair was positioned to teach how to aim correctly. Two pictures of this trainer are shown below; the manufacturer's label can be seen on the bottom of the box, AEROS (?) LTD., London.
![]() ![]() Before we continue with recognition aircraft, some attention should be paid to British ship recognition models. According to maritime historian Edward P. Von der Porten, in an article he wrote for Nautical Research Journal, March 1996, the Bassett-Lowke company (located in Northampton until 1942 with shops in London) supplied 1:1200 scale waterline ship models to the British Admiralty in 1911 which was the introduction of this scale to the military. These models, used for training and recognition, were made of wood with wire for guns and masts. As WWII loomed, Bassett-Lowke still made wood and wire ship models in 1:1200 scale. According to the excellent book, The Bassett Lowke Story by Roland Fuller, 1984, the 1:1200 waterline models originally were made in 1908 as souvenirs for navy men and travellers. Fuller writes, "It was, however, the hand-made series that interested ship lovers, and over the years until 1939, when production for retail sale was discontinued, models of every new ship of importance were produced and avidly collected by enthusiasts. It was also this class of model that interested the Admiralty as they realised that their three-dimensional depiction was much more useful for recognition training than the customary silhouette drawing. From 1911 on there were regular contracts from the Admiralty, and, in the Second World War, also from the R.A.F. During both World Wars, of course, enormous quantities were produced for personnel training. The fact that they were hand-made enabled any reconstruction of the prototype to be rapidly reproduced." Oddly, although the Bassett-Lowke book is profusely illustrated with photos, and has hundreds of ship model illustrations, including some larger scale Admiralty models, there are no recognition models pictured and only the brief mention quoted above. I have found it difficult to obtain much information concerning the British recognition ship model program. Ron Crawford mentions that a number of wood shops made recognition models but that the Bassett-Lowke models were works of art in scales of 1:1200, 1:500 and 1:300. I would appreciate any information and pictures which could be included in this discussion of the British wartime program. A small booklet, Progress of Transport by Water by W.J. Bassett-Lowke, is a text of a talk that Mr. Bassett-Lowke made to civic organizations in 1949. He used a set of hand-made 1/1200 actual size waterline ship models, primarily commercial vessels, to demonstrate his lecture. Included in this booklet is a catalog of 1:1200 commercial ship models, but there are two pages devoted to wartime models. A quote from Chief of Naval Air Service, Rear-Admiral AL. St. G. Lyster, C.B., C.V.O., D.S.O. is given: "...I wonder if those who make these models really understand the great part their models play in the training of the Royal Navy in their work at sea. "Ship recognition plays such a vital part in all sea warfare, and as far as my own branch of service is concerned, that is, the Fleet Air Arm, an early appreciation by the aircrews and recognition of what they see during their reconnaissance flights over the ocean is invaluable and I do not think we should be able to reach the high state of training which we get, without the assistance of the Bassett-Lowke models. "During my extensive experience at sea in this war, it has been very rare for the Fleet Air Arm to make a mistake in the recognition of enemy ships, ships which they could not actually have seen before, but have been able to recognize by being trained on your models..." The two pictures below are from this booklet. Shown are a set of 1:1200 waterline models, a destroyer, cruiser, battleship and aircraft carrier (I'll leave it up to you to identify each!). The second picture is a 1:300 scale model of the H.M.S. King George in camouflage. Of interest, the 1949 booklet lists twenty-two 1:1200 warship models for sale, the most expensive being the H.M.S. Illustrious at 61/-.
![]() ![]() The model shown below is a Bassett-Lowke 1:1200 scale waterline identification model of the H.M.S. Rodney which is in the museum's collection.
![]() Recognition training became emphasized in the Services in 1942 with a vigorous effort by the RAF and the Inter-Service Recognition Committee. Recognition training underwent a major change in early 1943 as Americans began arriving in Great Britain. The American "Flash Recognition Trainer", a projection device with variable shutter speeds, was introduced. The visual recognition method of split second identification set to rest the method of carefully analyzing each and every detail of a silhouette or model as had previously been advocated. Models were continued to be used extensively. In 1944, the ROC was to provide hundreds of recognition trained "Seaborne Aircraft Identifiers" to serve with the U.S. and British navy during the "Overlord" invasion.
![]()
![]() Here is a selection of official recognition models covering different materials and manufacturers, both from WWII and postwar (Korean War) era. All are in 1:72 scale. Some of the WWII models were generously donated to the museum by Tom Harkenrider whose father brought them back from England after serving in the 8th Air Force so their provenance is unquestioned. I welcome any additional information that you can offer.
![]() A bakelite plastic, solid model with raised letters "HE. 111.MK V." on fuselage bottom. Model is heavy and is "slick" with no indications of control surfaces, cockpit etc. This is the same manufacturer as the He 115 shown at the beginning of this article.
![]() A cellulose-acetate plastic, hollow-feeling model by a different manufacturer than the He 111. This model has the raised lettering, "SAVOIA S.M. 84" on the fuelage bottom and lettering under the stabilizer, "STORES REF NR 52/417". Has raised details and a parting line that runs from the wing T.E. to the stabilizer L.E. Fins are glue attached.
![]() An unusual model in shell-molded plastic with clear plastic for turrets, windows, nose etc. This model has been painted and has raised lettering on bottom, "FORTRESS II". This model does not correspond to any plastic kit manufactured by FROG Penguin.
![]() ![]() ![]() This is a Lines Bros. FROG model produced from "buckram" which I understand is a cloth-like material molded with a binder (sort of like a water-based version of a modern glass fiber reinforced resin). Walt Grigg, an extraordinary wood model kit collector and author of many articles on the subject, advises that buckram was a starched fabric used to manufacture ladies hats and it was molded under heat and pressure. Not detailed and the model has no really thin surfaces. Sort of crude but satisfactory for recognition purposes. Buckram was not exclusively used by the British; the American model company, Ideal, offered a ready-to-fly model, the "Victory", with a 16 1/2" wingspan in 1940 which had a "non-breakable buckram fuselage" according to the ads. Selley-Tex also used buckram for model kit parts such as fuselage, cowl, wheel pants etc. The decal "ALBEMARLE" appears as shown above.
![]() ![]() A wood model, nicely made with some detail. A decal, "BERMUDA", is affixed to bottom. The outstanding book on FROG models, FROG Model Aircraft, by Richard Lines and Leif Hellström, has a single paragraph on wartime FROG recognition models and it is stated that some wood models were made but most were buckram. This decal would suggest that FROG also made this wood model. What do you think?
![]() Another wood model, a B24J with no markings. Nicely constructed but the finish is a different texture than the "Bermuda". Also have several other wood models that have differences so not sure how many different WWII wood model manufacturers are represented in the museum collection. Perhaps as many as four or five. George Cox suggested that probably the markings or labels have been removed or come off because all British models were marked. Additionally, George says that the British wood models are probably scarce because following WWII, the British citizens faced economic hardship and privations including the lack of fuel so that surplus wood products such as the models would have been used for firewood. The following models are 1:72 scale postwar wood identification models. Markings are different on all shown here so could be from different sources.
![]() This wood model was manufactured by the Rowley Workshops. The label on the underwing reads, "52/914 MARTIN 2-0-2 Sc. 1/72 Rowley Workshops". I have some information that they may still exist as a special effects company in Rodley, Leeds, West Yorkshire. Anyone know? The museum has a number of Rowley Workshops models, all very nice. These are smooth with no detail scribing.
![]() This model is marked with a rubber stamp as "WAW 1"; is this an inspection stamp or the manufacturer? Also marked, "VICTOR II MK I 6092 1/72 SCALE". Have a Valiant with "PATT NO. 6078" with a stamp reading "I.W.A.D."
![]() This nice model of the Lockheed "Connie" has a rubber stamp, "L.B.B.LTD.11". Also is marked, "STORES REF 52/882 CONSTELLATION E.B.B.". A model of the B-50, 6039, has an oval decal, red letters on black background which reads "E.B.B." What company is this?
![]() A large 1:72 model of the Boeing B-52. This model was obtained, along with several others, from the Island of Malta.
That's my selection of British recognition models to present you with a few mysteries. Any Sherlock's out there? For more information on the Royal Observer Corps you can go to http://freespace.virgin.net/richard.wordsmith/roc/rochist.htm.
Return to Top of Page ![]()
493rd B.S., 7th B.G., 10th A.F. , in India, gets briefing on November 24, 1943 for a mission to Rangoon. Note the many recognition models hanging from the ceiling. I suspect that these models provided more decoration in the briefing room than training but constant exposure was important. This display arrangement for the models has been recreated in the Friend or Foe? museum training room.
![]() Recognition is all-important when unidentified planes approach a task force at 300-plus m.p.h. A squadron of planes appears heading toward a U.S. task force in the Pacific. There is no radio contact. If the planes are ours they are probably in trouble and lost; preparations must be made to help them. If they are enemy, a few seconds delay may mean the difference between voctory and defeat. The admiral of the task force hesitates and turns to his recognition officer. "What do you advise?" he asks. "They're Kates, sir," says the recognition officer. "Are you sure?" The recognition officer has another look through his glasses. Behind him are months of training and a new but fine tradition that has been built up since the war began by Yankee ingenuity, college psychologists and a collection of practical recognition experts, which includes an ex-hotel executive and the manager of the baseball farms of the Cincinnati Reds. In a few seconds, the man on the battleship lowers his glasses. "Fixed landing gear - never mind the details - they're enemy torpedo planes," he says. The ack-acks swing into action. One Kate blows up in midair from a direct hit, another crashes in the sea and explodes. Those that survive miss their targets and fly off in ragged formation. The Navy's recognition system, made in the U.S.A. and a bellwether for systems used by the Air Forces and ground troops around the world, has scored another victory. This true story of recognition-in-action today is the rule rather than the exception. But the happy ending often failed to come off early in the war. Recognition was one of the least-known quantities in the entire panorama of war problems when the Japs struck at Pearl Harbor. In other wars it had not been an important factor. Soldiers in the War Between the States had only to recognize the color of the enemy's uniform and begin shooting. A vague knowledge of what the speed of the airplane was introducing into modern warfare was picked up by recognition experts in World War I and a few pamphlets were published. But until the shooting began in World War II nothing of importance was done about the recognition problem and nobody considered it important. The British were the first to change their minds. They quickly learned the vital need for recognizing an enemy plane instantly and opening fire - or seeking an air raid shelter. Intensive recognition education resulted. Models, movies and instructors were used, with the emphasis on aviation, and civilians were organized under the Royal Observer Corps. Everybody from children through service men to old men and women participated in the training program, which one U.S. Naval officer officially described recently as a "whale of a job." U.S. work in the same field, spiced by some typical Yankee innovations, picked up where the British left off. Because the Navy usually had first and most frequent contact with the enemy, especially in the Pacific theater, it was the first to realize the seriousness of the recognition problem and to do something about it. By spring of 1942, the Naval Aviation Training Division in the Bureau of Aeronautics had completed plans for training recognition officers. Up to this time, recognition had been taught by the so-called WEFT System - the letters representing wings, engine, fuselage and tail - but difficulties were discovered almost immediately. It took too long to teach instructors and they, in turn, found difficulty in getting their knowledge across quickly to men in the field. Some of the latter, in typical GI style, thought up a new set of words for WEFT that were neither complimentary nor printable.
![]() An equally uncomplimentary opinion of WEFT was voiced by Dr. Samuel Renshaw, a professor of psychology at Ohio State University, who for a number of years had made a hobby of optics, carrying his studies to the point where he even tested the deterioration of the optic nerves under the influences of alcohol. Dr. Renshaw, co-operating with Navy, favored discarding the WEFT system for a system of psychological recognition of planes. He pointed out that a small boy can tell you it's a Thunderbolt when the plane is a speck on the horizon even though he cannot tell you why he knows it's a Thunderbolt. The WEFT system, said Dr. Renshaw, involved too many opportunites for mistakes and too many delays in hair-trigger recognition. He proposed the "perception of total form" system - designed to enable you to recognize a plane as you'd recognize a friend, without realizing exactly why. Implementing the educational work which resulted from the Renshaw theory was the use of flash exposures, which gave the student only time to see the total form. Silhouettes were flashed on a screen at a speed up to 1/100th of a second. Incidentally, the Renshaw theorists toyed with the idea that, bersides training a student in recognition, they would also improve his sight. There are two schools of thought on the subject, the other believing that eye-sight is not actually improved but that the student learns to use his eyes more efficiently, broadening his "cone of vision." Whatever the truth, recognition training was speeded up tremendously and became progressively effective in the field. This is not to say that progress was steady. As was the case in almost every other aspect of the war effort, time became thhe chief ally of setbacks and failures. There wasn't enough time left in a world war to train all the necessary personnel quickly enough to supply the immediate combat needs. Although every available recognition officer worked until he dropped to sleep on his feet, there was not enough time to train enough men to carry the colossal recognition load during the invasion of Italy - and a tragic number of our paratroop transports were shot down by allied surface craft who mistook them for enemy dive bombers. Recognition of ground and surface equipment, as well as aircraft, had to be taught. And it was found by recognition officers that while the basic psychology of the total form system was excellent, practical application in the field called for a number of changes. Typical revisions were those made following the return from fighting areas of such men as Lieut. Friedrich Fleig, former baseball farm manager for the Cincinnati Reds. Fleig joined up for action and got it as a recognition officer at Guadalcanal. There he discovered he did not know enough about planes and especially new enemy models. Hating desk work, he nevertheless asked for transfer to Washington to set the informational material aright. Gradually the werinkles have been ironed out and typical American mass production methods installed. In May, 1942, a two weeks course for 25 A-V(S) officers brought in from Naval pre-flight schools was established at Ohio State University. An index to the lack of emphasis placed on recognition at the time was that this school was to be discontinued at the end of four months. But so many requests for recognition officers came in from the fleet that the work was continued. Recruitment of civilians was required to meet the demands. By November, 1942, the first indoctrination class of 75 ex-civilians was opened, a 60-day course which eventually was taken by 550 men who are today serving on ships and at air bases of the Navy's far-flung battlefront. Men back from the fleet also continued to receive training. By January, 1943, the quota of recognition officers was more than doubled, to 1,200 officers - training to go forward at the rate of 170 per month. On graduation these men went to all Naval activities other than aviation, the plan being to have recognition officers assigned to the ship's company of all units of the fleet from capital ships to destroyer escorts, and in shore-based activities. Another sea-duty bug in the program was that the recognition officer often found time hanging heavily on his hands. Not infrequently his total contribution was a few seconds' work similar to that recounted at the beginning of this article. Beginning in March, 1943, this was offset by sending all officers at Ohio State on graduation to Purcell, Okla. where they had 30 days' training at the Naval air gunners school. A few men were sent to air combat information school at Quonset Point, R.I. By August, all recognition training for A-V(S) officers was completed after about 800 men had been trained. Refresher training is, of course, continuing. As time went by a fleet commands recognized the the value of recognition officers, duties at sea were increased according to the ideas of the command. There are more than 400 men aboard a capital ship who at one time or another must do look-out work. Recognition officers have been put in charge of intensive courses for these men. Lectures on the up-to-the-minute intelligence on enemy equipment are frequent. Many recognition officers have graduated into intelligence work or added it to their schedule. On the receiving end of the information, Naval aviators, of course, are at the top of the list. From the day a cadet pilot starts training until he goes into combat, he gets approximately 175 hours of recognition training. Refreshers when on active duty are numerous and detailed. Surface craft, both friendly and enemy, get almost as much attention as friendly and enemy planes.
![]()
A painting from a wartime National Geographic magazine article entitled "A Navy Artist Paints the Aleutians". The painting is by Lt. William F. Draper, U.S.N.R. Because of the muddy Aleutian base, these naval fliers are wearing Army clothes. Note the "Air News" magazine on the table along with the model project being worked on by Lt. (j.g.) Carl Dillon.
Another painting from the wartime National Geographic magazine article entitled "A Navy Artist Paints the Aleutians". The painting is by Lt. William F. Draper, U.S.N.R. Captioned "Friend or Enemy? Navy Officers Memorize Warship Outlines. Long winter nights allow ample time for classes in ship identification. By lamplight, Lt. (j.g.) R. Deladield, air combat intelligence officer, instructs. Seated, left to right, are F.R. Robinson, warrant carpenter; Lt. (j.g.) J.W. Sahlman, Ensign J.J. Romero, and Lt. (j.g.) Royal A. Lett. Silhouettes of enemy planes line the walls of their Yakutat hut on Umak. When the Japanese sneaked into the Aleutians in June, 1942, ship identification became supremely importatnt..."
The over-all program is under the recognition sub-section of the aviation training division, headed by Lieut. C.D. Coffman, former officer in charge of the recognition courses at Ohio State - and an assistant manager of the Mayflower Hotel, Washington, D.C., before he went into uniform. The program was organized in the spring of 1942 by then Captain, now Rear Adm. A.W. Radford, then director of Naval Aviation Training. At that time the work was supervised by Lieut. Comdr. W.W. Agnew. Aiding in co-ordinating and disseminating information to the field is a committee meeting bi-weekly whose membership includes RAF and Army ground and air force officers as well as Navy leadership in the recognition field. Even today the program is far from static. Fraction-of-a-second slides of planes are still "required reading" in refresher courses and to supplement lectures in the field and at sea, but a number of somethings new have been added. Among them are the shadowgraph, moving pictures and balopticans, not to mention a device that only American brains could have adapted to the uses of war - the pin-ball machine. And daily from the battle areas come comminiques testifying how the program has paid huge dividends by saving U.S. lives and personnel and by helping to destroy the enemy. Despite the much-publicized transport tragedy dury the Sicilian invasion and the fact that only 22 recognition officers participated, Adm. R.E. Ingersoll reported after the fighting was over that "the efficiency of the identification officers in the operation was extremely gratifying." As a result of the Sicily incident, Rear Adm. Alan G. Kirk, in charge of amp hibious operations then as well as against France, recommended that a recognition officer be stationed on all battleships, cruisers, destroyers, transports and cargo ships in amphibious operations. This recommendation has since been adopted and there are today more than 2,000 recognition officers on active duty. Scores of anecdotes spice the reports from battle areas. Ther is the one of the U.S. dive bomber squadron leader who peeled off in a contested area in the Pacific which he thought was patrolled by enemy ships only. His target was a battleship. And then he remembered its lines - it was one of our own fleet. Had he continued his dive, death to himself and his companions or destruction of a $100,000,000 battlewagon and los of its crew might have resulted. Fleig, teaching in a grass hut in Guadalcanal, had one of his students come back from his first combat with a Jap Hamp to his credit. The Hamp had come upon him suddenly but the young American pilot had immediately opened fire. Why? "It was a Zeke with square wings," said the victor. "I recognized it immediately from the slides we used to study." Recognition - or lack of it - works both ways. A Jap pilot who apparently hadn't studied up recently sidled up to a Liberator in a "Jake," Jap single-engine float observation plane sometimes used as a dive bomber. He thought he was among friends - until it was too late for him to get away. One of the most enthusiastic partisams for recognition training is Vice Adm. Marc Mitscher, skipper of the now famous Task Force 58. Admiral Halsey is another. But perhaps the best example involves a carpenter's mate on a destroyer in the Atlantic fleet. With a battle station below decks, he began to study under his recognition officer as a hobby. He proved to be an expert in short order and today, when the shooting begins, his station is on the bridge beside the skipper.
![]()
APPENDIX TWO
Most U.S. military World War II recognition models were made of injection molded cellulose acetate plastic; the Cruver Manufacturing Company in Chicago, Illinois was the prime manufacturer of the 1:72 scale models. The Design Center, Inc. in New York City made about a dozen models during WWII and the Leominster Plastics Co. is reported to have made at least two models under contract although they were constructed of blow-molded plastic. The slightly bendable models, most molded in black color, have been incorrectly identified as being produced from "hard rubber" by many observers. This faulty belief is not the only myth associated with the plastic recognition models.
Major collectors of these models, museums which have recognition model collections, dealers in models, auction houses, writers, and countless owners of a few models purloined by their relatives during WWII can all testify to the mysterious "melting" models which just shrink or liquify as they eventually disappear into a black dust or a pool of gooey, inky fluid. Some collectors have assumed that all models will wind up shrinking so have sold off collections or nervously watch over their plastic air force expecting it to vanish one day.
A whole folklore has been spawned by the disappearing recognition model syndrome. Home remedies of all sorts, myriad reasons for the melt, and expert opinions abound. As a collector, I became more than just interested in this phenomenon as I witnessed the transformation of a perfectly nice model into worthless dross, unable to arrest this culprit or pinpoint the actual criminal. Can this crime be stopped? Investigation of the misdeed led me to a University of California chemistry professor who offered only his condolences. Why is this chemical felony being perpetrated on recognition models and not on other plastic gizmos? Is it storage conditions, atmospheric anamolies, the ozone layer, or some conspiracy? Should we panic?
As in any endeavor, first we must establish the basics. Unless we know something about cellulose acetate plastic, there is no way an intelligent approach to this "melting" problem of decompostion can be found.
The earliest plastic, celluloid, is well known for its use in early film and is notorious for its flammability. It was first manufactured around 1872 and is still used today for table tennis balls. A substitute for celluloid and its attendant fire hazard was sought by chemists for many years. The reference book, Pioneer Plastic - The Making and Selling of Celluloid, by Robert Friedel, describes the measures taken to find a better plastic. "The first succesful acetylization of cellulose was achieved ...in 1869. Despite the efforts of numerous chemists over the next decades, the acetyl derivitives of cellulose remained purely of laboratory interest until the early twentieth century, when the Dreyfus brothers and others succeeded in solving numerous production problems. Cellulose acetate was also widely used as a fiber (known as 'celanese' or rayon), but it quickly gained a reputation as a nonflammable substitute for celluloid. Its high price, however, prevented it from replacing the older material very widely until the 1930s." The first injection molding machines were introduced in 1934. Note also that another different plastic, the first of the artificial resins, Bakelite, first appeared for commercial use in 1909.
The following background information is from Plastics, by J.H. Dubois, reprinted 1946. Cellulose acetate is first produced as a flake; cotton or wood cellulose is disolved in acetic acid and acetic anhydride with a catalyst such as sulphuric acid (Note that acetic acid can be made by repeatedly distilling vinegar). This "syrup", following ripening in huge jars, is poured into cold water which precipitates small flakes of cellulose acetate; the flakes are washed and dried to become the basis for the plastic. A compound must then be produced. Quoting from the book, "The flake cellulose acetate is worked in kneading machines where the plasticizers are introduced. Acetone is added at this time, and the mass is kneaded until it is worked into a jell-like mass. The plasticizers serve to bring the small flakes into a homogeneous or uniform mass. They also lower the melting point to a workable temperature. These plasticizers are blended to introduce certain desirable properties such as hardness, toughness, water resistance and increased dimensional stability. No one plasticizer introduces all the desired elements, so a mixture of the various plasticizers is selected to give the best balance of the properties that are desired. The acetone which is added serves to dissolve the flake and make the mass soft and easily mixed. This acetone content is kept as low as possible, since it is later removed by evaporation...."
Note the following concerning chemical resistance of cellulose acetate. "Cellulose acetate is unaffected by hydrocarbons products such as gasoline, benzol, toluol or by mineral and vegetable oils. Weak acids and alkalis affect this material slightly, and it must not be used in the presence of strong acids or alkalis. It is resistant to alcohol and ether. Acetone is a solvent and is often used to weld two pieces of acetate together. Best results (This works good for repairing recognition models) are obtained by dissolving a small amount of the material in acetone and using this solution as a cement to produce a firm and lasting bond."
Cellulose acetate is the material used in nitrate dope and even the old 78 rpm records I believe - use them with acetone to make your own adhesive.
All of this brings us closer to a solution, or at least an understanding, to the crime of "melting". The final clue can be found in the voluminous wartime publication, Plastics Catalog - The 1944 Encyclopedia of Plastics. The Hercules Powder Company, Inc. was a producer of basic cellulose compounds including cellulose acetate. Keep this fact in mind as you read the following selected quotes from page 145 of this catalog. "Both chemical and physical processes are involved in the manufacture of cellulose acetate plastics. They are not pure chemical compounds, but rather solid or colloidal solutions of cellulose acetate in plasticizers. For the conversion or colloidalization of cellulose acetate, plasticizers are required. These are generally liquids of high boiling point and low vapor pressure which, in most cases, have a solvent or gelling action on the cellulose acetate. Several types are used, either singly or in combination, the amount and type depending upon the characteristics desired in the finished plastic. Common plasticizers normally used in cellulose acetate plastics include: diethyl phthalate, dimethyl phthalate, methyl phthalyl ethyl glycolate, dimethoxy ethyl phthalate. Triphenyl phosphate, although not as active an agent as the others, is often used because it imparts fire resistance. Now here is the importatnt part. The impact of war has forced a change in the supply of these materials, because of the need for phthalic anhydride for glyptal resins and smokeless powder ingredients. The small amounts of phthalic esters made available to molding powder manufacturers are being extended with glycerol esters, such as the acetins or tripropionin, tartrates, higher glycols, certain substituted phenols, sulfonamides such as ethyl para-toluenesulfonamide, citric and carballylic esters and acetyl triethyl citrate... It takes ingenuity for the supplier to keep his products uniform in behavior, in the face of shifting materials supply." A section on plasticizers further states that, "The regular grades of cellulose acetate, containging 52.5 to 53.5 percent acetic acid, are generally plasticized with mixtures of methyl and ethyl phthalates." Note that the phthalates are on the priority list. All of the plasticizers evaporate - some more than others. A flexible plastic requires that the plasticizer remain serviceable for a longer time; in some cases more than half the plasticizer will escape, affecting rigidity.
Cruver (and the Design Center) was dependent upon suppliers to furnish the cellulose acetate powder (granular) used in their injection molding machines. It is doubtful that any real quality control was used on the incoming powder in that it was being primarily used for a product that was basically expendable - the recognition models. Cruver also made many other plastic products during WWII; see the four-page ad below which is in the above catalog. ![]() ![]() I have seen many WWII cellulose acetate plastic items curl up and die from exposure to heat (leave a time-distance computer on your airplane's instrument panel shield, for example) but I haven't seen items such as telephones, flashlight cases, gas mask parts, spectacle frames, computers, radio panels, combs, flare cases, etc. "liquify", even to this day, yet they are all made from cellulose acetate. Model collectors have seen examples of Cruver models which appear to be made from old toothbrush handles, displaying striated color material when the black lacquer is removed. It would appear that Cruver used whatever raw plastic material was on hand without regard to the applicability of certain plasticizers. One nice thing about cellulose acetate is that, once shot, it can be reground and reused - a version of a modern recyclable. Cruver airplane were not alone in the disappearing business. I had a box of 1:500, "Teacher Type Merchant Vessels", Army Air Forces Property, Stock No. 5300-717798-7, which were all made of solid, gray cellulose acetate plastic. The entire box of models disintegrated, warped, shrank and otherwise self-destructed. These models were also made by Cruver. My theory on the whole "melting" situation is that Cruver used various batches of cellulose acetate granules and some of those batches used a plasticizer that was less than adequate to last over 60 years! It is obvious that the best plasticizers were not available to the industryso you had to take what you could get. All collectors are familiar with the phenomenon of just part of a model melting. Many of the larger Cruver models were constructed from several parts, each of which would have gone through an individual manufacturing cycle, not necessarily at the same time or using the same batch of granules. A good example is the PBY Catalina; it's rare to find a PBY wing that hasn't begun to shrink or melt but I've never seen a bad PBY fuselage. Certainly a heated environment can warp IDs but I don't believe it materially contributes to melting unless the plastic already has a propensity to shrink. I have a perfectly good PBM Mariner hanging from my museum's classroom ceiling; I got that particular model from a Sunnyvale, California garage where it hung from the ceiling for about 30 years - a hostile environment yet it didn't bother this flying boat. Certain model types have exhibited a much greater propensity to melt. To my knowledge, information on specifications, number of models manufactured (or even how many runs were made of a particular model) was not kept so we have nothing today to check against. We are pretty much stuck with conjecture coupled with some science. Of interest is the fact that the dozen Design Center models (a molder's mark of a square with an interlocking "DC" inside) seem to hold up better with few experiencing "melting" - perhaps the Design Center had a better supplier. There's only one thing you can do with a shrinking model - toss it out when it gets too ugly! No home remedy is going to restore a melter or shrinker. It's not catching like a virus nor treatable. Many models will exhibit a slight vinegary smell even though they're not shrinking or "wet". Wetness is a sure incipient sign of a deteriorating model and is absolutely non-reversible. If purchasing a genuine WWII recognition model, be certain that it is in perfect material condition; broken parts, even warps, can be fixed, but not shrinking. I'm convinced that a good percentage (75%?)of the Cruver models will continue to last well into this century and are excellent collectibles. Many of us have learned the expensive way that deteriorating cellulose acetate airplanes are heading for the boneyard. Replacing a shrinker is a gamble that one should take only if willing to take the risk. Several pictures of "shrinking" models are presented below; some of these are not from my own collection (I've had plenty of melters) but are pictures taken right off of eBay of models for sale! So, watch it out there. The B-17 appears as if it was severely blasted by flak but be assured that this is not a battle scar but spontaneous "melting."
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Oddly, the Cruver 1:432 scale "pocket" models, also made in cellulose acetate plastic, don't have a "melting" problem. Maybe because the green plastic was a better formula? Or is it because they are all thin sections? Postwar recognition models, made in much smaller quantities, by many other companies, weren't hampered by strategic material priorities and are made from a much more stable plastic, cellulose acetate butyrate, although even some of these can exhibit problems. Contrary to a widely held belief that the cellulose acetate butyrate plastic models of the postwar era are immune to "plastic fatigue", I have recently discovered two grey models which have experienced plastic deterioration or "melting". During an inventory of several hundred, stored postwar recognition models, I ran across the first bad "grey" models that I've seen. An AD-5W Aug 57 and a P6M-1 Seamaster June 1957 both having significant decomposition in the fuselage/wing area. Still, a very small percentage loss.
Please use the Feedback Link if you have anything to add to this discussion or would like to comment on the mystery of the Disappearing Recognition Models. SOURCE OF RECOGNITION MODELS
Obviously Polk's had a glut of the Aristo-Craft models by the 1947-48 period and tried to move them out of inventory by having an "auction" for dealers. A wholesale flyer was sent out with the details of the "By-Mail Auction" for lots of the Aristo-Craft plastic models (Cruver IDs). One page of the flyer is shown below.
![]() The following pitch appears on the reverse side: "Your chance to name your price for America's leading line of finished scale models, 100% complete - need no sanding or shaping. Die cast in durable, non-shrinking (?!?) plastic from precision molds, 1/72 scale, hairline exactness. Every minute detail of the full size aircraft is faithfully reproduced. Each mo |